Crate pallet_nomination_pools
source ·Expand description
Nomination Pools for Staking Delegation
A pallet that allows members to delegate their stake to nominating pools. A nomination pool acts as nominator and nominates validators on the members behalf.
Index
Key terms
- pool id: A unique identifier of each pool. Set to u12
- bonded pool: Tracks the distribution of actively staked funds. See
BondedPool
andBondedPoolInner
. - reward pool: Tracks rewards earned by actively staked funds. See
RewardPool
andRewardPools
. - unbonding sub pools: Collection of pools at different phases of the unbonding lifecycle. See
SubPools
andSubPoolsStorage
. - members: Accounts that are members of pools. See
PoolMember
andPoolMembers
. - roles: Administrative roles of each pool, capable of controlling nomination, and the state of the pool.
- point: A unit of measure for a members portion of a pool’s funds. Points initially have a
ratio of 1 (as set by
POINTS_TO_BALANCE_INIT_RATIO
) to balance, but as slashing happens, this can change. - kick: The act of a pool administrator forcibly ejecting a member.
- bonded account: A key-less account id derived from the pool id that acts as the bonded
account. This account registers itself as a nominator in the staking system, and follows
exactly the same rules and conditions as a normal staker. Its bond increases or decreases as
members join, it can
nominate
orchill
, and might not even earn staking rewards if it is not nominating proper validators. - reward account: A similar key-less account, that is set as the
Payee
account fo the bonded account for all staking rewards.
Usage
Join
An account can stake funds with a nomination pool by calling Call::join
.
Claim rewards
After joining a pool, a member can claim rewards by calling Call::claim_payout
.
For design docs see the reward pool section.
Leave
In order to leave, a member must take two steps.
First, they must call Call::unbond
. The unbond extrinsic will start the unbonding process by
unbonding all or a portion of the members funds.
A member can have up to
Config::MaxUnbonding
distinct active unbonding requests.
Second, once sp_staking::StakingInterface::bonding_duration
eras have passed, the member can
call Call::withdraw_unbonded
to withdraw any funds that are free.
For design docs see the bonded pool and unbonding sub pools sections.
Slashes
Slashes are distributed evenly across the bonded pool and the unbonding pools from slash era+1 through the slash apply era. Thus, any member who either
- unbonded, or
- was actively bonded in the aforementioned range of eras will be affected by the slash. A member is slashed pro-rata based on its stake relative to the total slash amount.
For design docs see the slashing section.
Administration
A pool can be created with the Call::create
call. Once created, the pools nominator or root
user must call Call::nominate
to start nominating. Call::nominate
can be called at
anytime to update validator selection.
To help facilitate pool administration the pool has one of three states (see PoolState
):
- Open: Anyone can join the pool and no members can be permissionlessly removed.
- Blocked: No members can join and some admin roles can kick members. Kicking is not instant,
and follows the same process of
unbond
and thenwithdraw_unbonded
. In other words, administrators can permissionlessly unbond other members. - Destroying: No members can join and all members can be permissionlessly removed with
Call::unbond
andCall::withdraw_unbonded
. Once a pool is in destroying state, it cannot be reverted to another state.
A pool has 4 administrative roles (see PoolRoles
):
- Depositor: creates the pool and is the initial member. They can only leave the pool once all other members have left. Once they fully withdraw their funds, the pool is destroyed.
- Nominator: can select which validators the pool nominates.
- State-Toggler: can change the pools state and kick members if the pool is blocked.
- Root: can change the nominator, state-toggler, or itself and can perform any of the actions the nominator or state-toggler can.
Dismantling
As noted, a pool is destroyed once
- First, all members need to fully unbond and withdraw. If the pool state is set to
Destroying
, this can happen permissionlessly. - The depositor itself fully unbonds and withdraws. Note that at this point, based on the
requirements of the staking system, the pool’s bonded account’s stake might not be able to ge
below a certain threshold as a nominator. At this point, the pool should
chill
itself to allow the depositor to leave.
Design
Notes: this section uses pseudo code to explain general design and does not necessarily
reflect the exact implementation. Additionally, a working knowledge of pallet-staking
’s api is
assumed.
Goals
- Maintain network security by upholding integrity of slashing events, sufficiently penalizing members that where in the pool while it was backing a validator that got slashed.
- Maximize scalability in terms of member count.
In order to maintain scalability, all operations are independent of the number of members. To do this, delegation specific information is stored local to the member while the pool data structures have bounded datum.
Bonded pool
A bonded pool nominates with its total balance, excluding that which has been withdrawn for unbonding. The total points of a bonded pool are always equal to the sum of points of the delegation members. A bonded pool tracks its points and reads its bonded balance.
When a member joins a pool, amount_transferred
is transferred from the members account to the
bonded pools account. Then the pool calls staking::bond_extra(amount_transferred)
and issues
new points which are tracked by the member and added to the bonded pool’s points.
When the pool already has some balance, we want the value of a point before the transfer to
equal the value of a point after the transfer. So, when a member joins a bonded pool with a
given amount_transferred
, we maintain the ratio of bonded balance to points such that:
balance_after_transfer / points_after_transfer == balance_before_transfer / points_before_transfer;
To achieve this, we issue points based on the following:
points_issued = (points_before_transfer / balance_before_transfer) * amount_transferred;
For new bonded pools we can set the points issued per balance arbitrarily. In this
implementation we use a 1 points to 1 balance ratio for pool creation (see
POINTS_TO_BALANCE_INIT_RATIO
).
Relevant extrinsics:
Reward pool
When a pool is first bonded it sets up an deterministic, inaccessible account as its reward destination.
The reward pool is not really a pool anymore, as it does not track points anymore. Instead, it
tracks, a virtual value called reward_counter
, among a few other values.
See this link for an in-depth explanation of the reward pool mechanism.
Relevant extrinsics:
Unbonding sub pools
When a member unbonds, it’s balance is unbonded in the bonded pool’s account and tracked in
an unbonding pool associated with the active era. If no such pool exists, one is created. To
track which unbonding sub pool a member belongs too, a member tracks it’s
unbonding_era
.
When a member initiates unbonding it’s claim on the bonded pool
(balance_to_unbond
) is computed as:
balance_to_unbond = (bonded_pool.balance / bonded_pool.points) * member.points;
If this is the first transfer into an unbonding pool arbitrary amount of points can be issued
per balance. In this implementation unbonding pools are initialized with a 1 point to 1 balance
ratio (see POINTS_TO_BALANCE_INIT_RATIO
). Otherwise, the unbonding pools hold the same
points to balance ratio properties as the bonded pool, so member points in the
unbonding pool are issued based on
new_points_issued = (points_before_transfer / balance_before_transfer) * balance_to_unbond;
For scalability, a bound is maintained on the number of unbonding sub pools (see
TotalUnbondingPools
). An unbonding pool is removed once its older than current_era - TotalUnbondingPools
. An unbonding pool is merged into the unbonded pool with
unbounded_pool.balance = unbounded_pool.balance + unbonding_pool.balance;
unbounded_pool.points = unbounded_pool.points + unbonding_pool.points;
This scheme “averages” out the points value in the unbonded pool.
Once a members unbonding_era
is older than current_era - [sp_staking::StakingInterface::bonding_duration]
, it can can cash it’s points out of the
corresponding unbonding pool. If it’s unbonding_era
is older than current_era - TotalUnbondingPools
, it can cash it’s points from the unbonded pool.
Relevant extrinsics:
Slashing
This section assumes that the slash computation is executed by
pallet_staking::StakingLedger::slash
, which passes the information to this pallet via
sp_staking::OnStakerSlash::on_slash
.
Unbonding pools need to be slashed to ensure all nominators whom where in the bonded pool while it was backing a validator that equivocated are punished. Without these measures a member could unbond right after a validator equivocated with no consequences.
This strategy is unfair to members who joined after the slash, because they get slashed as well, but spares members who unbond. The latter is much more important for security: if a pool’s validators are attacking the network, their members need to unbond fast! Avoiding slashes gives them an incentive to do that if validators get repeatedly slashed.
To be fair to joiners, this implementation also need joining pools, which are actively staking, in addition to the unbonding pools. For maintenance simplicity these are not implemented. Related: https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/issues/10860
Relevant methods:
Limitations
- PoolMembers cannot vote with their staked funds because they are transferred into the pools account. In the future this can be overcome by allowing the members to vote with their bonded funds via vote splitting.
- PoolMembers cannot quickly transfer to another pool if they do no like nominations, instead they must wait for the unbonding duration.
Re-exports
pub use weights::WeightInfo;
pub use pallet::*;
Modules
Macros
Structs
no_era
pool. This is guaranteed to at least be equal to the staking UnbondingDuration
. For
improved UX Config::PostUnbondingPoolsWindow
should be configured to a non-zero value.